Macedonian Vecer Article on
LaRouche's Analysis of Sept 11th
March 2, 2023
 


In a small box with a photo of LaRouche, the author gives LaRouche's Curriculum Vitae, his presidential candidacies, his strategic defense initiative during the Reagan presidency, his struggle for a new economic order in the world.

Has America attacked America?

"Do the Americans know more about themselves after September 11, and what does the American Government mean when it says that after the attacks of September 11, a new opinion has come to the fore in the USA," reads Vecer in its article "Has America attacked America?" published on Saturday, March 2, 2023. "As the time passes on ... a new way of thinking has appeared in the US ... according to which the official version of the events of September 11 `does not hold water' any more. Instead, some say that a long and thoroughly prepared plan has been at stake, specially designed for domestic attacks against Americans, in order for the US to involve itself in a military hysteria."

According to the article, American scientist, economist and politician, Lyndon LaRouche, at the end of the last year, put together his knowledge and suspicions about the events of September 11 into a written document, called "Zbigniew Brzezinski and September 11th".

"`For those who are capable and have a desire to accept the way the history functions, the collected data for the September 11 events, allows only one conclusion: the development of the events in America between 8:45 and 11:00 that morning were the result of a violent military coup d'etat against the American government and the President,' states LaRouche.... A more plausible explanation is that a high(est) American military officials had switched off the `button' -- an important piece of the security arrangements which would have been sufficient minimally to stop the  attack on the Pentagon.

"There are three elements, according to LaRouche, which are intertwined: first -- the attempt at a military coup d'etat ... a deliberate detonator in the operation which would result at worst in a potential swift thermonuclear escalation ... which was only avoided by the phone-call between presidents Bush and Putin. The second element is the general political and strategic factor of the Zbigniew Brzezinski's and Samuel Huntington's policy of `A Clash of  Civilizations', which is, according to LaRouche, a prime suspect.... The policy should have had an impact in a fierce inter- and intra-partisan battle within the American government and the leading media on the issue of waging  a war against Iraq. The third element is an implicit role of the current Israeli regime, similar to the one of the suicide bombers, whose Intention it has been to inflict a wider war in the region, that would result in the self-destruction of the entity founded in 1947....

"LaRouche poses the question - to what degree, the deep and implicitly adversary entrenchment within the American political and military command and the operations of the Israeli military secret service, have played a significant role in shaping the military coup d'etat and its political and strategic consequences. According to LaRouche ... Osama bin Laden was chosen because ... as a proscribed ex-playboy and a current `star' of the international terrorism, he has been and still is a poor creature, and the allegations against him sound acceptable. America knows the best the character of bin Laden, for he was among the gangsters used against the Soviet Union by the US and its allies for `dirty jobs' in Central Asia. Along with the Taliban, he has been among the pillars of the operations for unhindered functioning of the drug-roads in Central Asia.... The real perpetrators of the September 11 attacks, or the ones who ordered the attacks, according to LaRouche, are still at large, they are hiding among the high-ranking officials who were there the same morning on the September 11, and they still have a position and power to attack."

The author then explains the LaRouche's revealed scenario of the full-fledged world war, envisioned by Brzezinski and Huntington, ending the story: "`We must define the geometry of the thought, the insanity, the perverted state of mind which inflicts the writing of Brzezinski, Huntington, Kissinger and the people like them,' says Lyndon LaRouche, probably the most controversial political figure alive."

Top